The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff is privately pressing for a way out of the war with Iran, even as President Donald Trump continues to threaten more strikes. Three sources familiar with the matter told CNN that Gen. Dan Caine believes the available military options could backfire and that airpower alone will not achieve the president's stated objectives.
Over the last few weeks, Caine has made his concerns clear to other senior Trump advisers. One source put it bluntly: "Caine is looking for an off ramp."
According to the sources, Caine has raised the prospect of finding an off-ramp with CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance. He has also side-barred with those advisers to coordinate their positions before meetings with the president.
The goal is to explain the limits and pitfalls of the available military options, including those that do not involve ground troops. One source described it as Caine's way of "protecting the military."
Caine told lawmakers during a public hearing late last month that "airpower has its limits." That view is now shared by many of Trump's top national security officials, backed by military doctrine and intelligence assessments.
In late July, a plan for more aggressive strikes was met with skepticism from Caine and other officials. The only strong supporters were elements of CENTCOM and Israel, one source said. Trump eventually backed off after talking with Middle East allies, who warned that Iranian retaliation could hit their energy infrastructure.
"There really isn't much else to hit since it is whack-a-mole with drone and missile sites."
A second source said bombing bridges was similarly unlikely to yield productive results. Dwindling US stockpiles of key munitions are also a factor. Gulf officials have told the administration that shortages of high-end American air defense systems could undermine their ability to defend against Iranian retaliation.
This is a national security story with no California-specific details in the source report. It remains relevant to California readers who follow defense policy and the potential economic effects of a prolonged Middle East conflict, including energy prices and military deployment cycles.
The conflict began nearly six months ago, with early US claims that Iran's military capabilities had been decimated. Trump has pledged to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon and has repeatedly threatened to strike Iranian energy infrastructure. His advisers, however, now worry that escalation will not produce capitulation and could instead trigger broader regional retaliation.
The public posture from the White House remains confrontational, but the private message from the Pentagon's top officer is that there is no easy military solution. The next several weeks will test whether Trump's advisers can steer the conflict toward a diplomatic off-ramp before the military options become even more fraught.