Dire water conditions and missed deadlines on the Colorado River are complicating critical water decisions in California. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation last week released a 10-year framework that sets broad parameters for river management but imposes no specific long-term plan.
The federal blueprint allows releases from Lake Powell to dip low enough that they risk violating a legally required threshold for downstream deliveries. It treats dramatic cuts as an upper limit for future operations, not a final answer.
The first of those detailed plans could come any day. It is expected to impose cuts on the lower basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada. For California, this means an estimated 10% cut to its Colorado River supply through 2028, or roughly 440,000 acre-feet per year.
No mandatory cuts are expected in the upper basin states of Colorado, Wyoming, Utah and New Mexico, according to those involved in negotiations. The Los Angeles Times first reported the split. This reflects the limits of federal power: the Interior Department can force cuts in the lower basin, but has no comparable authority to impose cuts in the upper basin states, where the Congressional Research Service says legal limits are subject to ongoing debate.
“A cut is never fun, but you can deal with it. But not if you say, ‘Well, we have a cut here, and then maybe a cut in two years, and maybe another cut in two more years,’” said Bill Hasencamp, Metropolitan Water District's manager of Colorado River resources. “We need to plan for our future. And this deal does not let us do that.”
Keith Nobriga, an operations manager at Metropolitan, compares his job to insurance planning. The costs of choosing the wrong path could leave Southern California thirsty during the next drought, or unnecessarily increase water rates.
The Metropolitan Water District is the giant wholesaler that imports water from Northern California and the Colorado River to supply cities and other retailers serving 19 million people across six counties. During the most recent drought, when Northern California supplies dropped to a trickle, about 6 million Southern Californians faced unprecedented water restrictions in 2022.
Southern California is not facing such serious shortfalls yet, but uncertainty over the Colorado River compounds the risks the next drought will bring. Metropolitan is also planning the Pure Water Southern California recycling program with the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts, and it has committed hundreds of millions of dollars to planning the Delta tunnel and about $31 million for Sites Reservoir. Board votes on whether to approve the tunnel and recycled water project could come as soon as next year.
Key agreements for managing the Colorado River expire at the end of this year, including agreements reached in 2007 that lasted nearly two decades and took fewer than three years to craft. This round of talks has already taken longer and, so far, produced nothing so durable.
The federal framework is a band-aid, not a cure. Water managers need predictable supply numbers to plan multibillion-dollar projects. As the Bureau of Reclamation issues new two-year plans, California's voices in the negotiating room will shape whether those cuts become a manageable reality or a chronic crisis.